Design preview · adopts the Kaharagian design system
An official training service of the State of the Kaharagians
ADM 220 Course Records and Qualification Tracking
Lesson 4 of 10ADM 220

Eligibility, Prerequisites, and Selection

Lesson Overview

The three lessons before this one built the training record and taught how to keep it true. Lesson 01 set out the training record as the trusted account of what a member is trained to do, part of and consistent with the service record. Lesson 02 taught how a course completion or qualification is verified and recorded against a proper authority, never on a member's say-so. Lesson 03 taught how the practical components and certified-in-person elements are captured only on a sign-off by a qualified person. All of that work has a purpose beyond keeping a tidy account, and this lesson is about that purpose: using the record to put the right people forward.

A force does not advance its members at random, and it should not advance them by favour. When a member is to be sent on the next course, or considered for an appointment, there is a fair and orderly way to decide whether they are ready, and the training record is the instrument that decides it. This lesson teaches how the record is used to track eligibility: which course a member may take next, which prerequisites they have met, and which appointments they are prepared for. It teaches the College's prerequisites, the courses that must be held before another may be taken, with worked examples such as FLD 230 needing RMT 101 and FLD 201, and SIG 310 needing SIG 201 and SIG 220. It teaches how the orderly room and the selecting authority check those prerequisites against the record before anyone is put forward. And it teaches why this matters: a prerequisite check done honestly against a true record gates fairly, so that people are put forward when they are ready, on what they have actually completed, and not by favour, friendship, or guess.

A word the whole College carries, and which applies here as everywhere. This is the knowledge layer. The hands-on administration, reading a member's record against a course's prerequisites, drafting the eligibility check that goes to a selecting authority, keeping a selection board's input accurate, is practised and signed off in person where supervision allows, by the same logic the lesson itself teaches. By the end you will be able to explain what eligibility means and how the training record is used to track it, define a prerequisite and read a course's prerequisites from the catalogue and the qualification pathways, perform a prerequisite check for a named course against a member's record and say plainly whether they are eligible, prepare an accurate eligibility input from the record for a selecting authority, explain how an honest check against a true record gates fairly so people advance when ready rather than by favour, and recognise the limit of your role, that the orderly room confirms eligibility but does not select.

Key Terms

  • Eligibility: the state of being permitted to be put forward for a course or an appointment because the conditions for it have been met; eligibility is established from the record, not assumed.
  • Prerequisite: a course or qualification that must already be held before another course may be taken; the gate a member must pass through to be eligible for the next step.
  • Prerequisite check: the act of reading a course's prerequisites and confirming, against the member's training record, that each one is held and recorded; the orderly room's core task in this lesson.
  • Selecting authority: the commander or board that decides who is put forward or chosen for a course or appointment; the orderly room provides the input, the selecting authority makes the decision.
  • Selection board: a meeting of the selecting authority that considers members for a course, a qualification, or an appointment, working from accurate inputs drawn from the records.
  • Eligibility input: the prepared statement the orderly room provides for a selection, drawn from the record, showing for each member which prerequisites are held and which are outstanding.
  • Prepared for: the standing of a member who holds the training that makes them ready for an appointment; the College prepares and makes eligible, command appoints.
  • Qualification pathway: the published route through the courses that leads to a qualification, a speciality, or a level of command; the map against which eligibility is read.
  • Gate fairly: to decide who advances on what the record actually shows, equally for everyone, so readiness and not favour governs who is put forward.

What eligibility means, and how the record tracks it

Eligibility is a plain idea with a precise use. A member is eligible for something, a course, an appointment, a next step, when the conditions for it have been met. The training record is what tells you whether they have. The whole point of recording courses, qualifications, components, and sign-offs as carefully as the last three lessons demanded is that the record can now be read to answer a forward-looking question: is this member ready for what comes next. A record kept only to describe the past would be half a record. Kept well, it is also the instrument that governs the future, because every decision to put someone forward rests on what it shows.

There are three forward-looking questions the record is used to answer. The first is which course a member may take next: have they completed the courses that the next course requires. The second is which prerequisites they have met: the same question from the other side, listing what is held and what is outstanding. The third is which appointments they are prepared for: whether they hold the training that makes them ready to be considered for a duty. Each is answered by reading the record against a published requirement, the course's prerequisites or the appointment's expected qualifications.

   THREE FORWARD QUESTIONS THE RECORD ANSWERS

   QUESTION                          READ THE RECORD AGAINST
   --------                          -----------------------
   Which course may they take next?  the next course's prerequisites
   Which prerequisites are met?      the full prerequisite list
                                       (held vs outstanding)
   Which appointments are they       the appointment's expected
     prepared for?                     qualifications / pathway

   In every case: a published requirement on one side,
   the member's true record on the other. Eligibility is
   what you see when you lay them side by side. Nothing is
   eligible by assumption; it is eligible because the
   record shows the requirement met.

Notice that eligibility is never something the orderly room invents or grants. It is read. The requirement is published in the catalogue and the qualification pathways; the member's standing is in the record; eligibility is simply what you see when the two are laid side by side. This is why the integrity work of the earlier lessons matters so directly here. If the record is wrong, the eligibility read from it is wrong, and a member is either held back when they were ready or put forward when they were not.

Prerequisites: the College's gates

A prerequisite is a course or qualification that must already be held before another course may be taken. It is the College's way of making sure that a member arrives at a course with the grounding it assumes. A course on patrolling assumes the member can already navigate and handle the field basics; a course for a signals leader assumes the member is already a trained signaller. Rather than leave that to chance, the College states the assumption as a prerequisite, and the prerequisite becomes a gate: the next course may not be taken until the earlier ones are held and recorded.

Two worked examples from the catalogue make this concrete, and you should learn to read them this way. FLD 230 Patrolling and Tactical Movement has the prerequisites RMT 101 Recruit Training (Phase One) and FLD 201 Navigation and Fieldcraft: a member may not be put forward for FLD 230 until both RMT 101 and FLD 201 are completed and recorded. SIG 310 Signals NCO Course has the prerequisites SIG 201 Radio Communications and Message Handling and SIG 220 Communications Security and Digital Discipline: a member may not be put forward for SIG 310 until both SIG 201 and SIG 220 are held. In each case the prerequisites are not a suggestion or a guideline; they are the conditions of eligibility, and the orderly room reads them exactly as written.

   READING A COURSE'S PREREQUISITES

   COURSE                              PREREQUISITES (all required)
   ------                              ----------------------------
   FLD 230  Patrolling and Tactical    RMT 101  Recruit Training
            Movement                   FLD 201  Navigation and
                                                 Fieldcraft

   SIG 310  Signals NCO Course         SIG 201  Radio Comms and
                                                 Message Handling
                                       SIG 220  Comms Security and
                                                 Digital Discipline

   How to read it:
     - "all required" means every prerequisite, not any one.
     - each must be HELD and RECORDED, not merely attempted.
     - the level digit hints at the journey (Lesson on
       pathways), but the prerequisite list is the gate.
   Where the catalogue lists a prerequisite, treat it as a
   condition, not a recommendation.

Two cautions on reading prerequisites. First, a prerequisite list is conjunctive unless the catalogue says otherwise: where two courses are listed, both are required, not either. Some pathways do offer a choice ("one of"), and where they do the catalogue says so plainly; absent that wording, read every listed prerequisite as required. Second, a prerequisite is met only when the earlier course is genuinely held and recorded against its authority, as Lessons 02 and 03 taught. A course a member has begun, or attended part of, or "all but finished", does not satisfy a prerequisite. Eligibility runs on completed and recorded qualifications, not on near-misses, because the next course was built assuming the earlier one was truly held.

The prerequisite check: how the orderly room confirms eligibility

The prerequisite check is the orderly room's central task in this lesson, and it follows the same disciplined sequence every time. The aim is to be able to say, plainly and on evidence, whether a named member is eligible for a named course, and to show the working so a selecting authority can rely on it.

First, fix the course and read its prerequisites. Take the exact course the member is being considered for, find it in the catalogue and the qualification pathways, and write down its full prerequisite list. Use the catalogue's own course codes and titles, so there is no ambiguity about which course or which prerequisite is meant.

Second, read the member's training record. For each prerequisite, look for a completed and recorded qualification in the record. It must be the right course, completed, and recorded against a proper authority. A prerequisite that is present but unrecorded, or recorded but not yet completed, is not met, and you treat it as outstanding until it is sound. Where a prerequisite course itself carries a certified-in-person element, confirm that element is signed off, because an incomplete course does not satisfy a prerequisite.

Third, mark each prerequisite met or outstanding, and reach the plain result. If every prerequisite is met, the member is eligible for the course, and you say so. If any prerequisite is outstanding, the member is not yet eligible, and you say which prerequisite is missing and what would close the gap. The result is never "probably" or "more or less"; it is eligible, or not yet eligible with the specific reason. That clarity is what lets the next course be filled on a true footing.

   PREREQUISITE CHECK: FLD 230 FOR ONE MEMBER

   COURSE CONSIDERED .. FLD 230 Patrolling and Tactical Movement
   MEMBER ............. [rank] [name], [service number]

   PREREQUISITE           IN THE RECORD?              RESULT
   ------------           --------------              ------
   RMT 101 Recruit        completed, recorded         MET
     Training             (auth on file)
   FLD 201 Navigation     completed, recorded         MET
     and Fieldcraft       (auth on file)

   ELIGIBILITY ........ ELIGIBLE for FLD 230
   CHECKED BY ......... [orderly-room clerk], 13 Jun 2026
   NOTE ............... eligibility confirmed from the record;
                        selection remains with the selecting
                        authority.

   Had FLD 201 been only part-completed, the result would
   read: NOT YET ELIGIBLE, FLD 201 outstanding. Gap closes
   when FLD 201 is completed and recorded.

Record the check itself, do not just act on it. The check is a piece of administration with a result and a date, and where it informs a selection it should be filed and referable like any other input. A good prerequisite check does two jobs at once: it protects the next course from receiving an unready member, and it tells an unready member precisely what to complete to become ready.

From the record to the selecting authority

Putting a member forward is not a single act by one person; it is a sequence in which the orderly room and the selecting authority each do their own part, and the lesson is careful to keep them apart. The orderly room reads the record, performs the prerequisite check, and prepares an accurate eligibility input. The selecting authority, the commander or board, decides who is actually put forward or chosen. The orderly room confirms who is eligible; it does not select. Confusing these two roles is the commonest way for either favour or unfairness to creep in, so hold them distinct.

The orderly room's product for a selection is the eligibility input: a prepared statement, drawn straight from the records, that shows for each member under consideration which prerequisites are held and which are outstanding. Its virtue is accuracy and even-handedness. It does not argue for or against any member; it lays out, identically for everyone, what each member's record shows against the requirement. The selecting authority can then make its decision among the eligible, on grounds proper to selection, knowing that the eligibility floor beneath them is true. A selection built on a sound eligibility input cannot later be undone by the discovery that someone was never eligible at all.

   ELIGIBILITY INPUT FOR A SELECTION BOARD
   Course considered: SIG 310 Signals NCO Course
   Prerequisites:     SIG 201 and SIG 220 (both required)

   MEMBER          SIG 201   SIG 220   ELIGIBLE?   NOTE
   ------          -------   -------   ---------   ----
   [member A]      met       met       YES         -
   [member B]      met       outstdg   NO          SIG 220
                                                    outstanding
   [member C]      met       met       YES         -
   [member D]      outstdg   met       NO          SIG 201
                                                    outstanding

   Prepared by orderly room from the records, 13 Jun 2026.
   Shows eligibility only. Selection among the eligible
   (here A and C) rests with the selecting authority.

   The input does not rank, recommend, or favour. It states,
   the same way for every member, what the record holds.

Two disciplines keep this input trustworthy. First, it must be complete and even: every member under consideration is shown on the same terms, with the same prerequisites checked the same way, so that no one is quietly advantaged or omitted. An input that shows some members and not others, or checks some prerequisites more leniently for one member, is not an honest input. Second, it states eligibility and nothing more. The orderly room does not slip a recommendation, a preference, or an opinion of a member's worth into an eligibility input. Its authority and its value lie precisely in being the neutral, factual floor on which a fair selection stands. The moment it editorialises, it stops being a record check and becomes a thumb on the scale.

Eligibility for appointments, and being "prepared for"

Eligibility is not only about the next course; it also concerns appointments. The qualification pathways describe which training prepares a member for which appointments, and the record is read the same way to ask whether a member is prepared for a duty. A member who holds the team-medic pathway is prepared to be considered for a section team-medic appointment; a member who holds the signals NCO qualification is prepared for the signals NCO appointment. The orderly room can read the record against the pathway and say, on the training, whether a member is prepared for an appointment, just as it reads it against a course's prerequisites.

Here, more than anywhere, the lesson's central distinction must be kept clear, and it is the distinction the qualification pathways themselves insist on. The College prepares a member and makes them eligible; command appoints. Holding the training that prepares a member for an appointment is not the same as holding the appointment, and recording a member as "prepared for" a duty is not the act of giving them that duty. Rank is conferred by command, officers by Royal Decree; appointments are made by the authority that needs the duty filled; and the orderly room's part is only to show, truthfully, what the training has prepared a member for. The record creates eligibility. Only command creates the appointment.

This is also why the prepared-for reading must be modest and exact. The orderly room says what the training shows, that a member holds the qualifications a given appointment expects, and stops there. It does not judge whether the member should be appointed or whether the force needs them in that role; those are command's judgements, made among the eligible. The record can establish that a member is prepared for an appointment, and that is a real and useful thing to establish, but it can never establish that they will hold it.

Why honest checking gates fairly

The deepest reason for everything in this lesson is fairness. A force in which advancement runs on favour, on who is known, liked, or noticed, is a force that wastes its people and corrodes its own trust. The prerequisite check and the eligibility input are the mechanism by which the College and command put people forward on what they have actually done, equally for everyone, rather than on whom they know. When eligibility is read honestly from a true record, the gate is the same for every member: complete the required courses, hold the required qualifications, and you are eligible; do not, and you are not yet, whoever you are. That sameness is what fairness means in practice.

This fairness cuts in both directions. It protects the member who has done the work: their completed courses, recorded against authority, make them eligible as a matter of record, and no one can fairly pass over an eligible member on the pretence that they were not ready. And it protects the force from the opposite error, putting a member forward who is not yet ready because they are favoured or familiar. An unready member sent to a course they lack the grounding for is set up to struggle, and a member placed where real skill was needed without the training behind them is a danger, the same danger the integrity lessons warn of.

For the orderly room, this turns the prerequisite check from a clerical chore into a duty of fairness. Every time the check is done straight, against the real record, the same way for everyone, fairness is upheld. Every time it is bent, a prerequisite waved through for a favoured member, an outstanding course quietly overlooked, an eligibility input that flatters one candidate, fairness is broken at someone's expense. This ties directly to the integrity of the training record taught in Lesson 06 and to the ethical leadership of LDR 420: the administrator who checks eligibility honestly is one of the people who keeps advancement in the force fair. The record is the great leveller, but only while it is read straight.

In Practice: a selection board's input

A training clerk in the orderly room of a small home-defence unit is asked to prepare the eligibility input for an upcoming selection. Command intends to send members on SIG 310 Signals NCO Course when a place is available, and the selecting authority has asked the orderly room which of four interested members are eligible. The clerk begins not with the members but with the course: SIG 310 has the prerequisites SIG 201 and SIG 220, both required, and the clerk writes the pair down from the catalogue before opening a single record.

The clerk then reads each member's training record against those two prerequisites, the same way for all four. The first member holds both SIG 201 and SIG 220, completed and recorded against authority; eligible. The second holds SIG 201 but not SIG 220, which is part-completed but not yet recorded as held; not yet eligible, SIG 220 outstanding. The third holds both; eligible. The fourth holds SIG 220 but has never completed SIG 201; not yet eligible, SIG 201 outstanding. The clerk records the result for each, in the same form, with a date. One of the eligible members is a friend the clerk would gladly see promoted, and one of the ineligible members is well liked and clearly capable; neither feeling reaches the input, because the input states eligibility and nothing more.

The clerk prepares the eligibility input as a clean table: four members, the two prerequisites, met or outstanding for each, and the plain result, eligible for the first and third, not yet eligible for the second and fourth with the specific gap named. To the second and fourth members the finding is genuinely useful, because it tells each exactly what stands between them and the course. The clerk passes the input to the selecting authority, who will choose among the eligible on grounds proper to selection, and notes for the file that selection rests with that authority, not with the orderly room. The board's decision, whatever it is, now stands on a true and even floor: no one eligible was hidden, no one ineligible was dressed up, and the gate was the same for all four.

Check Your Understanding

  1. A member is being considered for FLD 230 Patrolling and Tactical Movement. Their record shows RMT 101 completed and recorded, and FLD 201 attended but not yet completed or recorded. State the prerequisites for FLD 230, give the plain result of the prerequisite check, and say what would close the gap.

  2. An orderly-room clerk preparing an eligibility input for a selection adds a note that one eligible member is "the strongest candidate and should be selected". Explain why this breaches the discipline of the eligibility input, and state what the input should and should not contain.

  3. Explain how an honest prerequisite check, done the same way for everyone against a true record, gates fairly. Give one way fairness is protected for a member who has done the work and one way the force is protected from an unready member being put forward, and name the two lessons or courses this ties to.

Reflection (write a short paragraph): Think about the difference between "the record shows this member is eligible" and "this member should be selected". Why is it important that the orderly room establishes only the first and leaves the second to the selecting authority, and what would you say to a respected leader who asks you to "just put their name forward" for a course whose prerequisites the member has not yet met?

Summary

  • Eligibility is read, not granted: a member is eligible for a course or appointment when the record, laid against a published requirement, shows the requirement met. The forward use of the record is only as sound as the record itself.
  • The record answers three forward questions: which course a member may take next, which prerequisites they have met, and which appointments they are prepared for. Each is answered by reading the true record against a published requirement.
  • A prerequisite is a course or qualification that must be held before another may be taken; it is a gate, not a suggestion. FLD 230 requires RMT 101 and FLD 201; SIG 310 requires SIG 201 and SIG 220. Listed prerequisites are all required unless the catalogue says "one of", and each must be genuinely completed and recorded.
  • The prerequisite check is the orderly room's core task: fix the course and its prerequisites, read the member's record for each, mark every prerequisite met or outstanding, and reach the plain result, eligible, or not yet eligible with the specific gap named.
  • The orderly room confirms eligibility; the selecting authority selects. The eligibility input is a neutral, even, factual statement of who is eligible, the same way for everyone; it never ranks, recommends, or favours.
  • The record establishes that a member is prepared for an appointment, but only command makes the appointment. The College prepares and makes eligible; command appoints, and officers are commissioned by Royal Decree.
  • Honest checking gates fairly: advancement runs on what the record shows, equally for all, rather than on favour. This protects both the member who has done the work and the force from an unready member being put forward.
  • This lesson builds on Lessons 01 to 03 (the training record, recording completions, and practical sign-offs, all of which the eligibility read depends on being sound) and leads into Lesson 05 (the training state, the aggregated view) and Lesson 06 (the integrity of the record). It rests on the College's qualification pathways and the course catalogue, connects to ADM 210 (eligibility for promotion and appointment, and selection inputs), and ties to LDR 420 (integrity and fairness) and CIS 220 (protecting the data the checks are read from).

Crown Copyright © 2026 | Published by Authority of H.R.H. The Prince of Kaharagia

Lesson 4 · Knowledge Check

Question 1 of 3

How is eligibility established?